In Murfreesboro and across Tennessee, property owners have a legal responsibility to keep their premises reasonably safe—not just from obvious hazards like broken stairs or wet floors, but also against foreseeable criminal activity. The law recognizes that crime can happen, and in some cases, property owners must take preventive steps to protect lawful visitors.
Premises liability refers to a property owner’s—or occupier’s—legal duty to ensure visitors are safe from harm while on their property. Tennessee law applies a “reasonable person” standard: if harm could have been reasonably forecast and prevented, the owner may be liable. This can involve typical hazards (slips, trips, structural defects) and, in some cases, preventable crimes by third parties.
While many states still differentiate between invitees, licensees, and trespassers, Tennessee has largely moved toward a single standard of “reasonable care” for all lawful visitors—emphasizing fairness, not visitor status.
Thus, whether you’re a tenant, customer, licensed guest, or invited visitor, the owner owes a reasonable duty of care.
Recognizing that not all crimes are preventable, Tennessee courts have carved out clear conditions under which a property owner can be held responsible for a criminal act:
This legal balancing act comes from McClung v. Delta Square (1996), a landmark case that shifted how foreseeability is assessed.
Tennessee law now requires courts to weigh the severity of potential harm against the burden on the owner to prevent it. A serious danger—even if somewhat unlikely—can still warrant mitigation if it poses significant harm.
Tennessee adopts a common-sense rule: if a property has experienced multiple similar crimes—or is located in a high-crime area—this suggests a duty to act. Lack of action under such circumstances can support a claim of negligence.
Mitigation doesn’t mean hiring a security army—it means taking practical steps relative to the risk. Surveillance, lighting, access control, signs warning of risk, or trimming shrubbery may be appropriate depending on the level of risk.
To file a successful claim, a plaintiff typically needs to prove:
In Tennessee, courts decide whether a duty existed, while juries often determine whether the owner breached it or if the harm was reasonably foreseeable.
Owners may defend claims by asserting alternative factors:
Each defense may temper or bar a claim depending on specific circumstances.
Applies to dangerous conditions that unreasonably attract children—like pools or unsecured fire pits—and can overlap with negligent security.
Property owners may be responsible for actions by their employees or independent contractors if negligence in hiring or supervision is proven.
Tennessee courts maintain a nuanced stance: not every crime leads to liability, but patterns of crime—when paired with lack of reasonable security—shift the balance toward duty. In McClung and related cases, the court emphasized proportionality: serious crimes in high-crime locations typically require stronger protective measures.
Owners should consider ongoing crime levels and adapt security (light, cameras, gates, patrols) accordingly.
Key Factor | Why It Matters | Local Context |
Foreseeability | Establishes duty to act if risk is predictable | Crime trends in Murfreesboro apartment complexes or retail areas |
Notice | Determines if owner “should have known” | Past incidents, maintenance reports, lighting checks |
Preventive Measures | Reasonableness vs. burden on owner | Installing simple deterrents—cameras, lights |
Causation & Damages | Connecting hazard to injury and harm | Documented injuries, police reports |
Defenses | Superseding cause, victim conduct, obvious risk warnings | Owner may shift blame to visitor |
If you or a loved one suffered harm due to inadequate security or criminal activity on someone else’s property, don’t wait. Time is critical. Reach out today to the Law Office of Gritton & Gritton for a free, no‑obligation consultation.
Call (615) 285‑5472 now to speak with our experienced team. Our dedication to local victims in Murfreesboro ensures you’ll be seen, heard, and effectively represented.
Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. Consult with a qualified attorney to discuss your specific situation.
Disclaimer: This blog post is intended for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice.